GitHub Pages hosts repositories. Most websites are not repositories.
GitHub Pages is free, reliable and perfect for what it was built for: the documentation site or project page of code that already lives in a public repo. The friction starts when the site is a business, the owner is not a developer, or the visitors are on 4G.
Every change is a commit, a push and a build
There is no upload button. You need a repository, a branch, a Pages setting and, for anything beyond plain HTML, a Jekyll or Actions build. Ten builds an hour, ten minutes per deploy, and a client who wants a phone number changed has to wait for someone who knows git.
Free means public, and not for business
On a free account a Pages site has to come from a public repository, so your source, drafts and images are open to anyone; private-repo Pages need a paid GitHub plan. GitHub’s own terms also say Pages is not to be used as free hosting for an online business, e-commerce site or SaaS.
Files go out exactly as they were pushed
GitHub Pages serves the repository as-is. The 2 MB hero JPEG from your template, the 200 KB font with every glyph in it, the unminified CSS: every visitor downloads all of it. Forms and analytics mean wiring up a third-party service for each.
GitHub Pages details as published in GitHub Docs (1 GB site limit, soft 100 GB/month bandwidth, soft 10 builds/hour, 10-minute deploy timeout, public repository required on free accounts, prohibited-uses policy). Check docs.github.com for the current wording.
Side by side, for a finished static site
Netlify and Cloudflare Pages are in the table because they are the other names on every “static hosting” list. All four are good products; they are built for different people.
| What you need | Fylo.Host | GitHub Pages | Netlify | Cloudflare Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upload a finished folder as a ZIPNo repo, no CLI | ✓ | Git push only | Netlify Drop | Direct upload |
| Edit a file in the browser and go liveNo rebuild to wait for | ✓ | Commit, then rebuild | ✗ | ✗ |
| Source files stay private on the free plan | ✓ | Public repo required | ✓ | ✓ |
| Business and client sites allowed on freePer each provider’s terms | ✓ | Restricted by terms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Built-in blog: posts, pages, categories, RSS, sitemapWritten in the dashboard, no build | ✓ | Jekyll, Markdown in git | Bring a CMS | Bring a CMS |
| Images converted to WebP / AVIF for youWithout changing your HTML | ✓ | ✗ | URL rewrite / adapter | Paid add-on |
| Font subsetting, minification, lazy loadingApplied by the host | ✓ | ✗ | Build plugins | ✗ |
| Responsive srcset and LCP preload injected | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Contact form without a backend | Pro plans | Third-party service | ✓ | ✗ |
| Visitor analytics in the dashboard | ✓ | Third-party service | Paid add-on | Web Analytics |
| Custom domain with automatic SSL | Paid plans | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free-plan traffic allowance | 1,000 visits / mo | Soft 100 GB / mo | Credit-metered | Unmetered |
| Git-connected builds and deploy previews | ✗ | Builds, no previews | ✓ | ✓ |
Keep GitHub Pages for the project. Move the business to Fylo.
A switch that costs you something you rely on is a bad switch. Here is the honest split.
GitHub Pages is still the right pick when
- The site is documentation or a project page for code that already lives in a public GitHub repository.
- You work in git all day and want push-to-deploy, with the source and the site in one place.
- You need a custom domain on a free plan. GitHub Pages includes one with HTTPS; Fylo’s custom domains start on Starter.
- Traffic is far beyond a small site’s. GitHub’s soft limit is 100 GB a month; Fylo’s free plan is sized for 1,000 visits a month, with paid plans from 25,000 up.
Fylo is the better fit when
- The site is a business, a client project, a portfolio or a landing page, and the terms of a developer service should not decide whether it can exist.
- Nobody on the team wants to learn git to change a phone number, and the source should not be public.
- The upload is a Webflow or Framer export, an AI-generated page, a bought template or a Hugo, Astro or Jekyll build.
- Your visitors are on phones and mobile data, and Core Web Vitals decide whether the page ranks.
- The site needs a blog, a contact form and analytics from one dashboard, in English, Hindi, Tamil, Bengali or whatever your readers speak, without a Jekyll theme or three third-party services.
GitHub Pages to Fylo in four steps, no downtime
Around ten minutes for a plain HTML site. Keep the GitHub Pages site live until your DNS change lands; nothing in the repository needs deleting. If the site needs a blog, open the Blog tab afterwards.
Get the built site
Plain HTML repo: open it on GitHub, Code → Download ZIP. Jekyll site: run jekyll build locally and use the _site folder, the output GitHub actually serves.
_site/about/index.html
_site/assets/main.css
_site/img/hero.jpg ← 2.1 MB
Zip it and upload
Compress the folder so index.html sits at the top level of the ZIP, then drop it on the homepage. Live on a fylo.dev address in seconds, source files private.
Switch on the optimizations
In the performance tab, turn on the toggles you want. Fylo rebuilds an optimized copy; your uploaded files stay exactly as they were.
Point your domain
On a paid plan, add the domain in the dashboard. At your registrar, replace GitHub’s four A records with the Fylo CNAME, then delete the CNAME file from the repo. SSL is issued automatically.
@ A 185.199.108.153
www CNAME your-site.fylo.dev
; SSL issued automatically
The performance work GitHub Pages leaves to you
Every item below is a toggle in the dashboard. Turn one on and Fylo rebuilds the optimized copy at the edge; turn it off and the original is back. No build plugin, no Actions workflow.
Nothing is applied silently. You choose what runs, and you can check the result on the speed checker before pointing a domain.
Add a blog to the site without a Jekyll build
A GitHub Pages blog is Markdown files with front matter in a _posts folder, a theme, a Gemfile and a build that runs on every push. On Fylo every site gets a Blog tab: write a post, pick a category, add an image and publish. Fylo writes the static post page, the archive pages, the RSS feed and the sitemap, and serves them from the same edge as the rest of the site.
- Posts and pages in a rich-text editor, with a Code view when you want the HTML
- Categories, tags and a navigation menu; a media library for images
- Three themes, or “match my site” to inherit your own header and footer
- Draft preview link, RSS feed, sitemap with lastmod, SEO checklist on every post
- Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu and a dozen more scripts, with the right fonts loaded
- Lives on your custom domain at
/blog/; 10 published posts on the free plan, more on paid plans
The rest of the shortlist, and who each one suits
If Fylo is not the fit, one of these probably is. The one-line verdicts are ours; the products are all solid.
Repository, build command, deploy previews and functions. The natural next step for a developer outgrowing GitHub Pages; a credit-metered free plan for everyone else. Fylo vs Netlify
Same edge network Fylo runs on, with git builds, direct upload and unmetered free bandwidth. You wire up image optimization and minification yourself.
Built around Next.js and framework apps with previews on every pull request. Its free Hobby plan is for personal, non-commercial use only.
Drag a ZIP or a single HTML file and get a link. Simple and friendly; no optimization pipeline, and the free plan is meant for one small site. Fylo vs Tiiny Host
Upload a folder, a PDF or a gallery and get a link, with an online editor. Served as uploaded; free sites need a login every 90 days. Fylo vs Static.run
Upload a ZIP, toggle the optimizations, add a blog, serve from 330+ cities. Built for sites whose visitors are on phones and whose owners are not running a git pipeline.
Sites that leave GitHub Pages for Fylo
Questions people ask before switching
index.html in it. Zip it, drop it on the homepage and the site is live. Changes are made by uploading again or by editing the file in the dashboard’s code editor and saving.jekyll build locally and zip the _site folder; that is the output GitHub serves. Upload the ZIP to Fylo. If the Jekyll site was mainly a blog, you can also skip Jekyll and write the posts in Fylo’s Blog tab instead.Same files you pushed to GitHub.
Faster site on the other side.
Drop your ZIP. We handle the milliseconds, and the blog.
Upload your site free No signup. No repo. Live in seconds.